BAE systems plans to cease Pearl Harbor ship repair operation
BAE Systems Hawaii Shipyard is getting out of the surface ship repair business at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, a move leaving 290 workers without a job, USNI reports.
The company plans to shutter its Pearl Harbor operation, starting with a round of layoffs in February. BAE will finish a final ship availability at the yard, scheduled for completion by the end of March 2021, before permanently shuttering its Pearl Harbor operation, according to an October letter to Hawaii state labor officials from BAE.
“This decision to cease business operations is due to the Navy’s decision to change its contracting strategy from a MSMO [a cost-plus Multi-Ship Multi-Option] based contract to a MAC-IDIQ [Multiple Award Contracts – Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity] based contract,” BAE stated in its letter to Hawaii state officials.
BAE works at Drydock 4 and Bravo Piers at Pearl Harbor.
A year ago, the Navy awarded BAE a $50.6 million cost-plus-award-fee, cost-plus-incentive-fee contract modification to an existing MSMO contract to upgrade Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Hopper (DDG-70).
However, the Navy has, for years, been phasing out the use of cost-plus MSMO contracts as it seeks to reign-in costs and cut down on its backlog of ships waiting for maintenance, USNI News reported in 2017.
The Navy controls costs with the MAC-IDIQ’s because of the firm fixed price setup. The Navy is also setting aside a significant amount of work under these contracts for smaller businesses, with the hope more private shipyards bid on some of the Navy’s less involved ship maintenance jobs.
“The increase in competition opportunities that MAC-MO offers has the potential to help save the taxpayer money, improve contractor performance, and promote accountability for results,” states a 2016 General Accountability Office report about the Navy’s contracting shift. “Under MAC-MO’s firm-fixed-price contracts for executing availabilities, prices do not change based on contractor performance, even if the contractor underbids to win the contract.”
With smaller jobs being saved for smaller businesses, BAE opted not to bid on work in Pearl Harbor because of concerns about its ability to keep a steady workflow at the yard in between large maintenance jobs, according to several press reports. The Honolulu Star-Advertiser first reported BAE’s exit from Pearl Harbor.
The shift in how the Navy structured its ship maintenance contracts was expected to cause some changes to employment, according to the 2016 GAO report authors. Among the findings, they wrote, “Navy officials told us they anticipated certain workforce reductions within the private sector under the firm-fixed-price contract structure.”
